Johannesburg's Non-Profit Organisations (NPOs) are facing a serious challenge. New funding rules from the Gauteng Department of Social Development (GDSD) for the 2026 financial year are hitting them hard. Provincial funds will no longer cover salaries for non-South African staff, and key leadership roles like chairperson and treasurer must now be held by South African citizens. This is not just an administrative change; it is a potential disaster for the vital services these NPOs provide. The city is already battling serious problems — including high unemployment, poverty, and decaying infrastructure. This new move could make things significantly worse.

Gauteng's New Rules: A Game Changer for NPOs

The GDSD introduced significant changes in its Service Level Agreement (SLA) clauses for 2026. The main point is that provincial funds cannot be allocated towards salaries for non-South African employees. Additionally, for NPOs receiving provincial funding, the chairperson and treasurer must be South African citizens. Non-South African workers may only be retained if they possess exceptionally rare skills. This presents a difficult situation for many organisations.

The GDSD states that these measures aim to prioritise South Africans, especially given the approximately two thousand unemployed social workers in Gauteng. Motsamai Motlhaolwa, a department spokesperson, indicated that social work is not considered a scarce skill, implying that local talent should fill these positions. However, organisations like the Gauteng Care Crisis Committee argue that the real issue is not foreign workers, but rather the government's failure to create adequate pathways for South African social work graduates to find employment. This perspective suggests a focus on symptoms rather than root causes.

The Human Cost: Long-Serving Staff Face Uncertainty

These rules are profoundly affecting NPOs and their staff. Concerns exist that these changes could lead to unfair labour practices and discrimination. Imagine working for years, providing essential services, only to be informed that your salary is at risk due due to your country of origin. People Opposing Women Abuse (POWA) shared a distressing example: a Zimbabwean social worker, with 15 years on the job, fully documented, and even eligible for permanent residency, might lose her salary. This is because GDSD is POWA's primary funder. Even if POWA secures alternative funding, the GDSD still insists a South African fills that funded position, according to Fatima Shaik, POWA's executive director. This situation is disheartening for those dedicated to helping others.

Funding Headaches: Joburg NGOs Funding Challenges Persist

These new regulations are compounding existing problems that NPOs in Gauteng have faced for years. Significant funding delays from the GDSD are a recurring issue. These delays have previously led to protests and even court battles, with organisations struggling to remain operational and pay their staff. In May 2026, the Gauteng Care Crisis Committee protested outside the GDSD's head office in Johannesburg, demanding overdue payments and accountability for these persistent delays. This marked the fourth such protest in four years, highlighting the GDSD's consistent failure to uphold commitments since a major court ruling in 2010.

The GDSD itself acknowledged errors in only providing organisations with a quarter of their allocated funding. Some NPOs had not received any payments since April of the previous year (2024/25 fiscal year). A High Court deadline was even imposed for the GDSD to disburse funds. Still, in May 2026, the GDSD claimed to have paid R339.3 million to approved NPOs in the first quarter of the 2026/27 financial year, with 1,131 organisations receiving funds. However, by late July 2026, Lerato Bob, the director for NPO funding, stated it was "impossible" to pay everyone simultaneously because the Provincial Treasury releases budget allocations incrementally each week. This bureaucratic process leaves NPOs in uncertainty, hindering their ability to plan or maintain operations.

Joburg's Struggle: A City on the Brink

This NPO crisis unfolds as Johannesburg, the City of Gold, faces numerous challenges. The city's infrastructure is in disarray – water and electricity systems are collapsing, roads are riddled with potholes, and refuse collection is inconsistent. To address the water system alone, an estimated R26.6 billion is required. The city loses 46% of its water, with 25% of the supply purchased from Rand Water unaccounted for.

The City of Johannesburg struggles with capital expenditure. By December 2025, only 26% of its R8.7 billion capital budget had been spent, significantly below the projected 50%. This indicates deeper issues in municipal governance. Electricity infrastructure is also failing, leading to frequent outages. The city owed Eskom R3.8 billion in July 2026, even after a payment of R4.3 billion. Business Leadership South Africa CEO Busi Mavuso highlighted that Johannesburg's electricity losses alone amount to R2.5 billion, impeding necessary upgrades. Positively, load shedding has been suspended since May 2025, with Eskom projecting no load shedding for the winter season (April to August 2026). However, load reduction may still occur in some areas.

The city is also under water restrictions. Johannesburg Water has implemented Level 2 water restrictions, prohibiting garden watering between 6 am and 6 pm and the use of hosepipes for washing vehicles. A major Rand Water maintenance shutdown on July 17, 2026, resulted in low pressure or no water in many areas. This instability, coupled with frequent changes in political leadership and vacant senior management positions, exacerbates the situation. President Cyril Ramaphosa himself described Johannesburg as a "painful sight" and an "appalling national economic emergency," referring to it as a "shadow of its former self." It is a polycrisis, marked by slow growth, unemployment, crime, and failing services. Meanwhile, the JSE All Share Index recently closed at 111,493.10 points, indicating some activity in the financial markets.

Community on the Edge: Who Will Help Now?

When government services falter, NPOs often step in. Residents are concerned because these organisations frequently provide the only assistance available when the city cannot. These new funding rules could severely impair their ability to help. NPOs operate at a grassroots level, delivering crucial services to the most vulnerable – including children, the elderly, people with disabilities, victims of gender-based violence, and those battling substance abuse. They reach individuals long before government services can, strengthening communities from Alexandra to Sandton City. Collaborative efforts are essential for a better Johannesburg, and these rules are making that more challenging.

Lisa Vetten, chairperson of the Gauteng Care Crisis Committee, states that these department decisions are forcing organisations into difficult positions, potentially compelling them to operate outside legal frameworks. She emphasises that NPOs are independent entities, not merely instruments of the department. This uncertainty, coupled with delayed funding and new restrictions, makes it impossible for NPOs to plan effectively or hire suitable personnel. Ultimately, vulnerable people across Johannesburg and Gauteng will suffer. Strong NPOs are vital for the well-being of the community. Local businesses can play a role in supporting NPOs, and understanding the impact of elections on service delivery is crucial.